Many people believe that Jocelyn should also have been awarded the prize because of her central role in the discovery. If you would like to read more of this story, I encourage you to read Jocelyn's own version:. Recall that the accretion of matter on a white dwarf in a binary system can lead to either a nova explosion or a supernova explosion. The next question is: What happens to neutron stars or pulsars in binary systems?
There are two possibilities that are not necessarily exclusive. That is, one system can exhibit both behaviors. We will not discuss "gravitational waves" as a separate topic in this course. However, this is an area of frontier research where the first direct detection was announced in February, There are several places you can go for more information:. Skip to main content. Neutron Stars and Pulsars Print Additional reading from www.
Figure 6. Credit: Space Telescope Science Institute. Watch this! These magnetic poles are generally misaligned with the rotation axis of the neutron star and so the radiation beam sweeps around as the star rotates. This is much the same as the beam of light from a lighthouse sweeping around.
If not, we see only the supernova remnant. This also nicely accounts for the fact that we do no see a pulsar in every supernova remnant. Neutron stars do not necessarily exist in isolation, and those that form part of a binary system usually emit strongly in X-rays.
X-ray binaries typically result from the transfer of material from a main sequence companion onto the neutron star, while short-duration gamma ray bursts are thought to result from the merger of two neutron stars. The existence of neutron stars as a result of supernova explosions was tentatively predicted in , one year after the discovery of the neutron as an elementary particle. However, it was not until that Jocelyn Bell observed the periodic pulses of radio emission characteristic of pulsars.
As the rotation carries first one and then the other magnetic pole of the star into our view, we see a pulse of radiation each time. This explanation of pulsars in terms of beams of radiation from highly magnetic and rapidly spinning neutron stars is a very clever idea. But what evidence do we have that it is the correct model? First, we can measure the masses of some pulsars, and they do turn out be in the range of 1.
But there is an even-better confirming argument, which brings us back to the Crab Nebula and its vast energy output. After all, when energy emerges from one place, it must be depleted in another. The ultimate energy source in our model is the rotation of the neutron star, which propels charged particles outward and spins its magnetic field at enormous speeds.
As its rotational energy is used to excite the Crab Nebula year after year, the pulsar inside the nebula slows down. As it slows, the pulses come a little less often; more time elapses before the slower neutron star brings its beam back around.
Several decades of careful observations have now shown that the Crab Nebula pulsar is not a perfectly regular clock as we originally thought: instead, it is gradually slowing down. Having measured how much the pulsar is slowing down, we can calculate how much rotation energy the neutron star is losing. Remember that it is very densely packed and spins amazingly quickly. Even a tiny slowing down can mean an immense loss of energy.
To the satisfaction of astronomers, the rotational energy lost by the pulsar turns out to be the same as the amount of energy emerging from the nebula surrounding it. In other words, the slowing down of a rotating neutron star can explain precisely why the Crab Nebula is glowing with the amount of energy we observe. From observations of the pulsar s discovered so far, astronomers have concluded that one new pulsar is born somewhere in the Galaxy every 25 to years, the same rate at which supernovae are estimated to occur.
Calculations suggest that the typical lifetime of a pulsar is about 10 million years; after that, the neutron star no longer rotates fast enough to produce significant beams of particles and energy, and is no longer observable. We estimate that there are about million neutron stars in our Galaxy, most of them rotating too slowly to come to our notice. The Crab pulsar is rather young only about years old and has a short period, whereas other, older pulsars have already slowed to longer periods.
Pulsars thousands of years old have lost too much energy to emit appreciably in the visible and X-ray wavelengths, and they are observed only as radio pulsars; their periods are a second or longer.
There is one other reason we can see only a fraction of the pulsars in the Galaxy. Consider our lighthouse model again. On Earth, all ships approach on the same plane—the surface of the ocean—so the lighthouse can be built to sweep its beam over that surface. But in space, objects can be anywhere in three dimensions. In fact, if you think about it, many more circles in space will not include Earth than will include it.
Thus, we estimate that we are unable to observe a large number of neutron stars because their pulsar beams miss us entirely. At the same time, it turns out that only a few of the pulsars discovered so far are embedded in the visible clouds of gas that mark the remnant of a supernova.
In fact some pulsars are moving times faster than a jumbo jet and would take only 16 seconds to travel between Sydney and London! As they age they move away from the plane of the Galaxy. The fastest pulsars will never come back - they will escape from the Galaxy and will travel off into the space between galaxies becoming undetectable.
Others will slow down and then drop back towards the plane of the Galaxy and will continue to oscillate up and down for the rest of their lives. Most stars in our Galaxy are in an orbit with another star our Sun is unusual in that it has no stellar companion. Similarly, many pulsars in particular the millisecond pulsars are found in binary systems.
The companions to pulsars have been found to be normal stars, planets, white dwarf stars, neutron stars and even, for one recent discovery, another pulsar. Studying the pulsar's motion in a binary system allows astronomers to determine many facts about the pulsar, its companion and the orbit.
For some systems, the mass of the pulsar can be determined and is found to be roughly one and a half times as massive as our Sun. We also know that pulsars are very small and so they must be very dense. In fact, one teaspoon of pulsar material would weigh a billion tonnes if we brought it to the surface of the Earth.
In the next section we attempt to put all these observational results together to form a picture of what a pulsar actually is. In Walter Baade and Fritz Zwicky predicted the existence of neutron stars: stars which have collapsed under their own gravity during a supernova explosion. Stars like our Sun will not form neutron stars. After exhausting all their fuel, such small stars become white dwarfs. Only very massive stars at least a few times more massive than our Sun will undergo a supernova explosion and become neutron stars.
Even more massive stars will collapse to form black holes. It was thought that neutron stars would never be detectable using telescopes on Earth. They were predicted to be very dense, to spin very fast, have a tiny radius of only about 10km and to possess large magnetic fields. However, we now know that charged particles moving along the magnetic field could cause beams of radiation to be emitted from the magnetic poles. Then, as the neutron star rotates, the beam would sweep across space. When this beam is in the direction of the Earth, a pulse may be detectable using a radio telescope see the animation above.
Could this "lighthouse model" answer the question of what a pulsar is? If we compare the observations of pulsars mentioned in the first section with the description of neutron stars in the second we find many similarities.
The pulses that occur at regular intervals correspond to a beam being emitted from a rotating neutron star.
The time between pulses, the period, is the time that it takes for the neutron star to rotate once. The increase in the period is due to the pulsar slowing down slightly as it loses energy. The youngest pulsars are found in supernova remnants which is exactly the place we'd expect neutron stars to be born.
Therefore the most likely explanation is that a pulsar is a neutron star that spins rapidly and emits radio waves along its magnetic axis. However, not all neutron stars are necessarily detectable as pulsars. The beams from some neutron stars may never pass the Earth and will therefore not be detected. Also, other neutron stars may have been pulsars in the past, but the process that causes the beam of radiation which is not fully understood may have turned off or is just too weak to be detected.
The types of pulsar - the ordinary and millisecond pulsars - can be explained by assuming that all of the millisecond pulsars were originally in orbit with another star. After the pulsar formed, matter was pulled from the companion star on to the pulsar. During this process the pulsar rotated faster and faster until it became one of the millisecond pulsars. Later, the companion star died and became either a white dwarf, neutron star or black hole depending on its original size.
If the companion star remained in orbit with the pulsar, a binary millisecond pulsar system would be formed. Nobody is quite sure of what exactly happens to a pulsar as it ages and slows down.
0コメント