If you're positing a scenario where suddenly all men disappear, then I don't think fashion would change much because of the history behind it and cultural inertia.
If you're trying to imagine how fashion would have evolved in a society of women without men ever When I dress up, whether it's for work or a social function, it's not specifically to impress men.
In fact, it's probably mostly to ensure that other women don't talk smack about my outfit behind my back. If no one is around to look at me, i. Best answer: Your question can be answered by examining how women in a cultural setting like that of the middle east dress, when they are out of the public eye but among each other.
Take Saudi Arabia for example. There is a huge market for high end fashion. This seems counter intuitive because women remain covered in public. Where would they be wearing all these chanel suits and fendi shoes? They wear them under them at the office So in the company of only other women, they glam themselves out in designer clothing that no one on the street will ever see.
You assume that women dress in such a way as to get men to look at them, but that's not always the case. I would wear a lot more revealing clothing like low-cut tops, especially if it weren't for men always staring at my boobs or checking out my cleavage.
So I defense-dress by covering up. So to answer your question, I would wear clothing that covered up less of me. Think Star Trek or dance class - very comfortable clothes required. I'd love to dress like they do in Star Trek, sort of.
Your friends say they're dressing for themselves, but their values -- what they think looks good -- are themselves influenced by the social and biological contexts. For example -- most women's clothes emphasize the shapes of breasts and hips. A social biologist will tell you it's because these parts of the body are associated with fertility.
The humans that displayed a tendency toward dressing to emphasize these features, and the humans with a tendency to react to this social symbology, were more likely to pass on their genes -- and their culture.
So, your friends say, "I'm dressing for myself. But all of the clothes in their closets are the end result of decades of "fashion" and tens of thousands of years of evolution. Men's presence has nothing to do at all with what I choose to wear. I wear what makes me feel good. I used to wear mini skirts and low cut tops and fuck-me boots.
It was fun attracting the attention but I got over that. I never ever wear high heels. Don't own a pair. I wear clothes to prevent me being naked, and to protect me from the weather. Occasionally I'll wear a particular item because it reminds me of some idea i know - weird eh? Some people wear clothes as an artistic statement. Some people wear clothes as an indication of status, some to attract others.
So many reasons. Silly to attribute one reason to an entire gender. The qualifier 'if men didn't exist' makes this a basically unanswerable question. If men didn't exist, clothing for women largely designed by men would probably have evolved in a much different way. And of course, if men didn't exist, and women are still reproducing, then that basically changes the whole nature of society, right?
So women may not be dressing up for men anymore, but they may at times be motivated to dress up for whoever or whatever is impregnating them, or protecting them, or having sex with them. And if that's other women, then the clothing is no doubt going to reflect that, but then, if men have never existed in this scenario, then the creatures we're talking about aren't really women anyway, and not really human, either.
I think it's easier if you think about it as "if men stopped existing" rather than "if men never existed. I've seen pumps and sneaks They just have stiletto heels as well. British influencer Loftus sees so much potential that last month she gave up her job with a fashion consultancy to devote herself full-time to her website, This Outfit Does Not Exist. Her Instagram shows the potential of virtual clothing that doesn't need to obey the laws of physics -- from a shimmering silver liquid pant suit with tentacles, to a wobbling pink creation with lasers firing out of her bustier.
Kids are asking each other: 'What skin did you have in this game yesterday? Online, she is known as Isodope and merges high fashion with a serious commitment to clean energy and environmental activism. If my videos featured me wearing a T-shirt and jeans, they wouldn't have the same appeal," Boemeke told AFP. This is essentially a parallel universe, but one in which people can remove handicaps can't travel, can't walk, too old, too young, the wrong race, the wrong gender, living in a remote location.
Naturally, fashion would be part of the way people express their metaverse identity. Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts. A mix of what's trending on our other sites. Kaoru Mugen.
For many, the idea of buying clothes that don't exist is a conceptual leap too far. This whole "it doesn't exist" argument is still as ridiculous as it always was. It just means Probably not something I would buy into, but I am not big into fashion myself either. One more way to rip people off.
So sad. William Bjornson. If they didn't eat the fruit they would have remained naked and would have stayed in the garden. I could go on but im sure you see my point. Everything was caused by sin. Very true what you say about clothes. But I think it would still exist in another way and having to do with other characteristics. Another thing you have to remember is that a large percent of people who look for sex, aren't looking for it with the type of people they see everyday.
So unless you change perceptions and behaviors, and giant hands in the sky start photoshopping and soft lensing everyone, a large percentage of people will still try and look for porn online or from creepy uncles. Its monkey see, monkey do. Then I thought it would have been brought up by now, but lots of culture around the world still go by and exist with minimal clothing. Other things provide the same sort of visual discretion. Like war paint and animal feathers, and hair length or style.
So if food didn't exist would people still be hungry? Of course. Most other animals don't wear clothing, and yet there is still some standard of quality when it comes to selecting a mate. The argument presented in the OP is flawed but whatever. Sex appeal is biological and clothes doesn't really factor into it.
0コメント