Why columbus is a villain

What did they know about the man? This results to fear is destructive is because the result of this action results in the white man killing the Clan of Abame. Christopher Columbus Is Columbus really the man we think he is? Columbus is a well known figure for he discovered America and led other explorers and conquistadors there too. He has impacted history greatly and is argued to be either a positive or negative person.

Columbus is a villain due to how he planned to use the natives, and how conceited and harsh the Spanish were. Who is Christopher Columbus? Teachers tell their students that he sailed the ocean blue in , and discovered the New World, but he lingers in history as a question mark and a mystery.

He may have exposed the New World to the Old World, but many of his actions were unacceptable. Christopher Columbus was a villain who brought devastation and slaughter to the native population. Columbus did terrible things such as encouraging men to rape girls, having harsh punishments for people with minor offenses, and he lead hunting dogs to tear the Indians apart.

He caused many problems like death, slavery, and destroying culture. He also mutilated these enslaved people if they did not find enough gold for him. They were usually punished by the loss of a limb and, on occasion, by death. Why Columbus is a Villain Columbus is the basic definition of evil since he ended up achieving all of his goals.

Which were introducing new foods and animals to the Western World and bringing gold, but he only managed to obtain this through the most crude way possible. To bring further notice to his wickedness Columbus should be considered a villain because of his involvement in killing off all the natives and how he thinks of them as mindless slaves that are here on this earth to make their lives easier.

To commence, Christopher Columbus should be considered a villain because of his involvement in killing off all the natives. His financing came from the hope that he would find a lucrative new trade route. He did nothing of the sort: the people he met had little to trade. An opportunist, he captured Indigenous people to show that they would make good enslaved workers.

Years later, he would be devastated to learn that Queen Isabella had decided to declare the New World off-limits to enslavers. Again, this one is half-true. At first, most observers in Spain considered his first voyage a total fiasco. He had not found a new trade route and the most valuable of his three ships, the Santa Maria, had sunk.

Later, when people began to realize that the lands he had found were previously unknown, his stature grew and he was able to get funding for a second, much larger voyage of exploration and colonization. But more than that, Columbus stubbornly stuck to his guns for the rest of his life.

He always believed that the lands he found were the easternmost fringe of Asia and that the rich markets of Japan and India were just a little farther away. He even put forth his absurd pear-shaped Earth theory in order to make the facts fit his assumptions.

He is vilified by Indigenous rights groups today, and rightly so, yet he was once seriously considered for sainthood. Columbus may have been a talented sailor, navigator, and ship captain. He went west without a map, trusting his instincts and calculations, and was very loyal to his patrons, the king and queen of Spain. Because of it, they rewarded him by sending him to the New World a total of four times.

And yet, while Columbus might have had some admirable qualities as an explorer, most popular accounts of him today fail to highlight the significance of his crimes against Indigenous peoples. Columbus did not have an abundance of admirers during his time. Many of his contemporaries despised these actions.

As governor of Santo Domingo in Hispaniola, he was a despot who kept all profits for himself and his brothers and was loathed by the colonists whose lives he controlled. Attempts were made on his life and he was actually sent back to Spain in chains at one point after his third voyage. During his fourth voyage , he and his men were stranded in Jamaica for a year when his ships rotted.

No one wanted to travel there from Hispaniola to save him. He was also dishonest and selfish. Those who voice disdain for anti-Columbus historians may feel like the explorer's legacy is shouldering the weight of crimes that not only he committed. It is true that he was not the only person who enslaved or killed Indigenous peoples, and perhaps written histories should more explicitly acknowledge this fact. In this way, Columbus might then be more widely seen as one of several major explorers who collectively contributed to the decimation of Indigenous civilizations in the New World.

Straus, Jacob R. Marr, John S. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Use precise geolocation data. Select personalised content. In an article which appeared in The Nation 19 October , Columbus is compared to Hitler, and the atrocities committed by his successors to those committed at Auschwitz.

Columbus has become one of the worse villains in history. This is a completely different picture from that presented one hundred years ago when his stature was brought to new heights during the celebrations of the four-hundredth anniversary held all over this continent and Europe. Indeed, until a few years ago, the landing of Columbus on the shores of this continent was seen as an occasion to celebrate the most famous watershed in history, an event identified in all school books across the world as marking the beginning of the Modern Age.

Columbus was portrayed as the first modern man and his landing, with his human and cultural profile, was closely tied to his age. Most of us grew up believing in the established view that Columbus was the Renaissance man par eccellence , a man that affirmed the value of human independence and dignity, along with his aspiration to be the sole, authentic maker of his own destiny. We had come to view Columbus as the universal man who had the courage to press beyond the confmes of the known world while projecting himself beyond the limitations of separate national individualities.

In the West, or better yet, in Western Civilization, Columbus was presented as the hero who sparked a unique and extraordinary period of economic and social expansion, of growth and progress, of new and exciting discoveries in the fields of science and technology. Europeans felt very comfortable with these views; the Italian-Americans had become very proud of this hero and rightfully pressed Congress to make October 12 a national holiday.

The impact of his voyages has to be assessed also from the Native American perspective, that is, how the American Indians fared in the encounter. As in every event of world-wide magnitude and of profound change, before harmonious levels of human relations are socially and politically reached, good may come with destruction. However, a great deal of the controversy on Columbus has very little to do with and almost everything to do with It is a problem of truth — an intellectual problem, obviously, but political as well; indeed, it has become mainly political.

No scholarship is free of political and cultural biases, but serious scholars resist them. Columbus was not the gem of the ocean, the flawless hero of so many earlier hagiographies. In the process of reevaluating Columbus in this age of complete disdain for heroes, we are presented with another mythical figure, one of the most destructive villains in history who landed on a mythical land, a kind of earthly paradise, uncorrupted until The problem is congenital to history.

Usually, the destruction of myths is done through the creation of other myths. Stephan Thernstrom , an historian at Harvard, rightfully said that the descriptions of the European conquest of the Americas in black-and-white terms are no more reliable than Stalinist histories of the U. And so, there is simply no basis for seeing the clash between the Indians and the invading Europeans in stark good and evil terms — the peaceful innocents versus the murderous and avaricious Spaniards.